| 
			
				
					| BIF Supports Exhumation of Srila 
					Prabhupada |  
			
		 In reply to an earlier vicious attack against the IRM (ISKCON Revival 
		Movement) by the BIF(Bhaktivedanta Investigation Force, consisting of 
		Mandapa Das, Jitarati Das, Kamsahanta Das, Syamasundara Das and Sakshi 
		Gopal Das), I had stated that the poison investigation could: 
			
				| “Be proven at the risk of disturbing Srila Prabhupada’s 
				Samadhi (sacred burial place) to carry out an autopsy. An act 
				most of his disciples would find completely unacceptable.” (Poison Theorists Attack IRM, 11th March, 2005)
 |  1) In response to the above statement, BIF have not made any attempt 
		to challenge that such a risk exists, or even that they find such a 
		possibility of exhumation unacceptable. On the contrary they say that 
		such a risk exists: 
			
				| “An exhumation is not the prerogative of claimants, it is 
				ordered by the judiciary based on evidence which demands 
				conclusion. [...]Fourthly, the liability of exhumation may never 
				arise unless evidence is solid, and where suspects persist in 
				denial.” (BIF Letter, 11/4/2005)
 |  Here they accept that the Judiciary can order an exhumation if solid 
		evidence demands it (and the suspects continue to deny their involvement 
		as they do and have always done).
 2) BIF already accept as FACT that such solid evidence which would 
		result in exhumation, exists:
 
 
			
				| “Tamala Krishna Goswami. [...] Now marked as a suspect in 
				the poisoning of his benefactor, and the subsequent splintering 
				of his holy family. A murder most foul. [...] His Divine 
				Grace was poisoned. Nobody should doubt it. His assassins 
				acted in premeditation and in full knowledge of all the facts 
				needed to bring about an end.” (‘Judge For Yourself’, Pages 152,154, BIF, 2003)
 |  Their use of the words ‘murder’ and ‘assassins’ makes it clear that 
		BIF has already decided that a murder by poisoning took place - ”Nobody 
		should doubt it”. Hence in BIF’s estimation, murder by poisoning is 
		already a fact and therefore an investigation should result in 
		exhumation, since BIF believe that the solid evidence which leads to 
		exhumation does exist – it simply needs to be discovered – hence their 
		call for an investigation. And BIF must accept that such evidence can be 
		discovered, otherwise calling for a poison investigation to discover 
		evidence which does not exist or cannot be discovered, would be futile.
 3) Though in BIF’s judgment, the risk of exhumation is great, BIF state 
		that such a risk is acceptable in the cause of ‘truth’:
 
			
				| “In any case, a government investigation should be carried 
				out to establish the truth. Truth is above all else.” (BIF Letter, April 11th)
 |  By stating that a truth-seeking investigation, which they accepted in 
		point 1 runs the risk of exhumation, must be carried out because truth 
		is “above all else”, BIF are clearly stating that any resulting 
		exhumation is also acceptable, since ALL other considerations are 
		superseded (‘above ALL else’).
 4) And BIF alone are pushing to ensure that such an exhumation-risk 
		investigation takes place, by having filed a writ petition in the Indian 
		courts demanding the judiciary to authorise such an investigation.
 
 Thus in summary:
 
 BIF alone have taken steps that can result in the exhumation of Srila 
		Prabhupada.
 
 BIF accepts that such an exhumation is acceptable.
 
 BIF indeed considers such an exhumation high likely.
 
 (for their position is that solid evidence which calls for exhumation 
		does exist. Indeed they are trying to force an investigation just so 
		that such evidence which can lead to exhumation comes to light, and thus 
		according to their belief the only way exhumation can be avoided is if 
		30 years later suspects will suddenly confess, making exhumation 
		unnecessary).
 
 Whether they will succeed in getting the court to act, or whether such 
		solid evidence does really exist is another matter. But BIF definitely 
		believe such evidence exists, and thus are actively pushing for an 
		investigation which in their estimation runs a very high risk of 
		exhumation, because they state it is permissible for Srila Prabhupada’s 
		body be dug up in the name of truth. Hence BIF actively support the 
		exhumation of Srila Prabhupada’s transcendental body.
 
 Your servant, Yaduraja Das
 |