Autumn 2006
As we have consistently pointed out, the only possible way one could claim to be an initiating guru in ISKCON is if Srila Prabhupada, ISKCON’s real Guru, had authorised one or more successors. This authorisation by the bona fide spiritual master is not optional – it is a sastric (scriptural) injunction:
|
Below we see three more confessions that the creation of diksa (initiating) gurus in ISKCON to replace Srila Prabhupada was not based on any order from Srila Prabhupada. Rather, four separate reasons are given as to how these gurus came into being:
1) Other unauthorised gurus fell down.
2) The opportunity was there to take disciples.
3) A lot of pressure was applied to become a guru.
4) The GBC body decided that Srila Prabhupada should be replaced.
Bhakti Caru Swami became guru after “a lot of pressure” |
“I became a spiritual master after some of
my very senior and very qualified god brothers fell down. Therefore,
I didn’t have any illusion that I was a pure devotee and I was
infallible. Initially I didn’t want to take up this very grave
responsibility of becoming a spiritual master, but since quite a few
devotees were very determined to take initiation from me and were
waiting for a long time, and since there was a lot of pressure
from some of my senior godbrothers also, I accepted that
responsibility.” (Bhakti Caru Swami, 16/2/2002, PAMHO Text 5992588) |
Sivarama Swami became guru after pressure from a girl |
“At this time I also was asked to take up
the role of initiating spiritual master. I didn’t consider that this
would be very conducive to my personal spiritual life and I was
satisfied for others to do that service and that I would stay in the
role of sannyasi, a preacher, siksa guru, GBC, and
probably it was at Gaurangi’s (at the time a young female
devotee, and now a disciple) repeated prompting that
ultimately I began to think seriously of that service and took it
up.” (Sivarama Swami, Podcast, 4/10/06) |
They became guru after the GBC decided |
|
Return to Sivarama Swami index